When a city repeatedly wastes taxpayer dollars, refuses to enforce state law, allows violent crime to spiral, or ignores its financial responsibilities, the people who suffer most are the taxpayers, families, and hardworking citizens left to clean up the mess and pay the bill. Texans deserve better than to simply watch as their cities decline.
But we don’t have to live this way.
Twenty other states have a solution for exactly this kind of problem, that Texas has yet to implement: Municipal Receivership. Municipal receivership is a temporary state intervention for cities that have demonstrated chronic failure. It is a mechanism by which failing cities would be “corrected” and steered back in the right direction by a state-appointed receiver. This is neither permanent, nor is it subjective. Lawmakers in the Legislature would establish objective standards that must be met before a receiver could be appointed, and, likewise, course-corrected measures would be met before turning back over full control of the reins locally.
Standards used elsewhere have included persistent fiscal mismanagement, repeated violations of state law, refusal to cooperate with immigration enforcement, chronic violent crime, or other failures that threaten the safety, rights, or financial well-being of Texans.
Importantly, cities would first be given every opportunity to correct courses themselves. Only after repeated failures would the state intervene. Once clear performance benchmarks are met, local control would be restored.
Texas already recognizes this concept in principle regarding public education. When school districts fail to meet their obligations or protect students, the state has intervened. The Texas Education Agency has walked alongside districts in gross failures until the issues were resolved. Eventually, local governance is restored. Municipal receivership simply extends that same accountability to city governments and other rogue jurisdictions.
Texas taxpayers have seen too many examples of local governments placing radical ideology or unacceptable mismanagement ahead of basic responsibilities. Cities spend millions on projects that provide little public benefit while asking taxpayers to approve exorbitant bond packages. Other cities have openly challenged state law, forcing costly legal battles paid for with taxpayer dollars. Meanwhile, some communities continue to struggle with rising violent crime, deteriorating infrastructure, and growing debt, even as property tax bills remain high.
Municipal receivership would establish a simple principle: if local officials cannot responsibly manage the authority entrusted to them by the state or by their constituents, the state has an obligation to protect its citizens. In fact, because local jurisdictions are created by the Texas Legislature, state government has explicit authority to ensure these rogue entities carry out the basic functions of government.
Local control depends on competent, accountable leadership. When elected officials repeatedly fail, taxpayers deserve a path to restore effective government. Municipal receivership protects that principle by laying out the process to restore it where it rightfully belongs: with the people.
Other states have demonstrated that temporary receivership successfully stabilizes distressed municipalities, restructures finances, restores essential services, and ultimately returns authority to local leaders once objective goals are met. With municipal receivership, state oversight is brought in only when necessary, and only as a temporary stabilizing measure. After meeting benchmarks, cities transition back to the governance of the local officials responsible for delivering on the new path.
Municipal receivership should remain rare. But when a local government consistently fails to protect citizens, enforce the law, and responsibly steward public resources, Texas should not stand by, because when major centers of commerce and civil life fail or fall into disrepair, the entire state suffers.
Ultimately, government exists to serve the people, not the politicians who run it.
Taxpayers deserve a government that works, and a temporary, accountable receivership process provides a responsible path to restoring fiscal discipline, public safety, rule of law, and public trust.
Texans for Fiscal Responsibility relies on the support of private donors across the Lone Star State in order to promote fiscal responsibility and pro-taxpayer government in Texas. Please consider supporting our efforts! Thank you!
Get The Fiscal Note, our free weekly roll-up on all the current events that could impact your wallet. Subscribe today!
