
Since 2011, market participants, regulators, and watchers have understood that intermittent energy sources—wind and solar—are causing three major problems in the ERCOT electric market.
First, their intermittency has increasingly pushed the grid towards unreliability. Second, they have driven reliable thermal generation out of the market because renewable subsidies have made investment in dispatchable generation unattractive. Third, they have contributed to ever increasing prices as the market, politicians, and regulators have struggled to improve reliability.
The answers to the problem of wind and solar generation have been obvious for more than a decade: 1) eliminate all Texas subsidies for intermittent generation, and 2) make wind and solar generators pay for the reliability costs they impose on the market due to federal subsidies. Unfortunately, the Texas Legislature has done neither.
Instead, the Legislature and the PUC have doubled down on market intervention, emasculating Texas’ energy-only market. This has taken two forms. The first is imposing significant regulatory restrictions on the market. A sample of these efforts is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Efforts to Increase Government Intervention in the Texas Electricity Market | |
Expansion of the RPS – 2005 | CREZ Lines – 2005 |
Re-Regulation of the Market – 2007 | Legislature Increases Regulation – 2011 |
Capacity Market – 2011ff | Implementation of the ORDC – 2014 |
Use of Ancillary Services to Increase Prices | Increase in the ORDC – 2019 |
PUC Price Increase: $9k per MWh – 2021 | Legislature Increases Regulation – 2021 |
PCM – 2023 | ECRS – 2023 |
The second intervention has been artificially raising electricity prices in an attempt to make investment in dispatchable generation profitable. The result of this is shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2Year | Renewable Subsidies | Thermal-focused Subsidies | Texas (ERCOT)Total | % of Renewable Generation |
2014 | $1,275,995,355 | $850,495,478 | $2,126,490,833 | 10.8% |
2015 | $1,527,364,920 | $1,083,472,123 | $2,610,837,043 | 11.9% |
2016 | $1,856,789,699 | $764,679,313 | $2,621,469,012 | 15.3% |
2017 | $2,181,736,097 | $820,139,285 | $3,001,875,382 | 17.9% |
2018 | $2,544,709,335 | $1,780,468,859 | $4,325,178,194 | 19.4% |
2019 | $2,533,784,302 | $6,335,105,059 | $8,868,889,361 | 21.2% |
2020 | $2,615,179,107 | $2,721,379,122 | $5,336,558,229 | 25.2% |
2021 | $3,563,567,563 | $16,944,745,697 | $20,508,313,259 | 28.4% |
2022 | $3,506,142,527 | $11,429,824,388 | $14,935,966,916 | 30.7% |
2023 | $4,035,263,673 | $15,928,559,292 | $19,963,822,965 | 31.6% |
5 Year | $16,253,937,172 | $53,359,613,558 | $69,613,550,730 |
As Table 2 shows, the consumer-financed $53 billion energy tax to pay for thermal-focused subsidies over the last five years has done nothing to eliminate the growth of renewables on the Texas grid, improve the reliability problems they are causing, or increase investment in thermal generation. And neither will the Texas Energy Fund, the Texas Nuclear Energy Fund, or Senate Bill 6. We simply cannot out-subsidize the federal government.
The only solution—at least the only affordable, permanent solution—is to decrease government intervention in the market and eliminate subsidies for all generation sources—wind, solar, and thermal.
Let producers and consumers—rather than regulators and politicians—decide the best mix of price, supply, and reliability on the electric grid.
In other words, the Texas Legislature should let the market work.
Texans for Fiscal Responsibility relies on the support of private donors across the Lone Star State in order to promote fiscal responsibility and pro-taxpayer government in Texas. Please consider supporting our efforts! Thank you!
Get The Fiscal Note, our free weekly roll-up on all the current events that could impact your wallet. Subscribe today!